| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Originally the thinking was that rototiller modules would become
dlopen()ed shared objects, and that it would make sense to let
them be licensed differently.
At this time only some modules I have written were gplv3, Phil's
modules are all gplv2, and I'm not inclined to pivot towards a
dlopen model.
So this commit drops the license field from til_module_t,
relicenses my v3 code to v2, and adds a gplv2 LICENSE file to the
source root dir. As of now rototiller+libtil and all its modules
are simply gplv2, and anything linking in libtil must use a gplv2
compatible license - the expectation is that you just use gplv2.
|
|
- switch puddle_sample() to 0..1 coordinates to avoid
some pointless extra arithmetic on every pixel
- avoid redundant ->w multiplies in puddle_sample()
- avoid multiplies in inner loops of drizzle_render_fragment()
by accumulating coordinates w/addition instead
I noticed full-screen 'compose' was struggling to keep a full
frame rate on my laptop when testing with the new 'plato' layer.
valgrind profiles showed drizzle as the big hog, mostly the
puddle_sample() function. These changes help but it's still not
great, getting much better will likely become invasive and
crufty. It would be nice to cache the vertical lerp results and
reuse them across puddle_sample() calls when valid, that might be
a useful TODO.
The runner-up is spiro, prolly some low-hanging fruit there as
well, I haven't looked yet.
|
|
These were commonish in the 90s demo days, done as a library to encourage
use by different modules.
You can simply render this directly onto a frame buffer like the old days,
or sample it as a height map or density field for more complex compositions.
|
