| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
I didn't like the too fast spins where you can't even really get
a read on what's going on in the shape.
Suspect this will get tweaked more in the future...
|
|
This is kind of experimental, not sure how I feel about it.
pinch=0..1 with a bunch of fractions, 0 disables it.
pinch_spin=-1..1 same as spin=
pinches=1..10 number of pinches, which come in pairs
This applies to all the current shapes, for a tour:
--module=rtv,channels=shapes,duration=2,context_duration=2,snow_module=none --defaults
I think the speeds might go to high atm, I kind of liked the
slower spins before all this more.
|
|
woops
|
|
scale=1-.5 with a few other fractions in between
Mostly added for the sake of rtv/compose where modules currently
always go full-frame, which can be really annoying sometimes for
shapes without any variety in the scale.
When checkers starts filling cells using modules like shapes,
it'll be interesting to see how this fares there since it'll
probably be randomizing the settings too. At least floored at
50% should still produce something legible in /most/ of the
checkers cell sizes. Definitely won't look like anything in the
smaller end of the checkers sizes though... hrm.
|
|
Introduces spin={-1,0,1} with a few intermediate fractions on
both sides of 0. Controls rate and direction.
As-is these multiple choice style options don't let you
explicitly set a value in rototiller on the commandline that
isn't in the set.
There should probably be a flag in the desc we can set when
bypassing the available options is tolerable, probably when
regex's start getting enforced.
That way rototiller's commandline setting parsing can just lean
on the regex, and if the desc says anything can come in that
passes the regex even if it's not in the values set, this can all
still work and have something resembling input validation.
At the end of the day, the multiple choice value sets are
supposed to be a convenience/guide to a sane variety of values
and of particular utility to randomizers like used by
rtv/montage/compose, but also GUI setting selectors like in
glimmer.
They're not intended to get in the way preventing development
from accessing explicit values of arbitrary precision which can
be really necessary especially when trying to determine what's
best for going in the values set.
|
|
Replace the hard-coded 5 points with a points=3-20 setting
Nothing fancy going on here
|
|
- clear padding when {letter,pillar}boxed
- limit costly rendering to shape size area when boxed
- fix <= inclusion tests in circle and rhombus: s/<=/</
|
|
In the recent surge of ADD-style rtv+compose focused development,
a bunch of modules were changed to randomize initial states at
context_create() so they wouldn't be so repetitive.
But the way this was done in a way that made it impossible to
suppress the randomized initial state, which sometimes may be
desirable in compositions. Imagine for instance something like
the checkers module, rendering one module in the odd cells, and
another module into the even cells. Imagine if these modules are
actually the same, but if checkers used one seed for all the odd
cells and another seed for all the even cells. If the modules
used actually utilized the seed provided, checkers would be able
to differentiate the odd from even by seeding them differently
even when the modules are the same.
This commit is a step in that direction, but rototiller and all
the composite modules (rtv,compose,montage) are simply passing
rand() as the seeds. Also none of the modules have yet been
modified to actually make use of these seeds.
Subsequent commits will update modules to seed their
pseudo-randomized initial state from the seed value rather than
always calling things like rand() themselves.
|
|
Mostly for compositing purposes, here will be a corpus of 2D
shapes, parameterized/procedurally generated and able to rotate
and perhaps have other dynamics added.
What shapes are there presently I had started implementing in
checkers as "styles", before realizing they really should just be
a separate module checkers can call into.
Not terribly interesting by itself, but as blinds and checkers
demonstrated, these things deliver a lot of value in
compositional situations. They're creating the palette to draw
from.
|
