| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
vmon introduces a non-overlay usage, monitors is correct but ambiguous,
graphs is also amiguous, charts is short and distinctive.
renaming of the files comes in a separate, future commit.
|
|
|
|
Introduce vwm_overlays_t and create/destroy functions, use in vwm_startup()
and vwm_shutdown(). Supply to methods operating on the global overlays
state vwm_overlays_update(), vwm_overlays_rate_increase(),
vwm_overlays_rate_decrease().
This is a fairly minimal adoption of these changes with vwm_t still being
supplyed to the overlay functions.
A future commit will further cleanup the interactions and cease all
knowledge of vwm_t in overlays.c, but for now everything overlay-oriented
still accesses the overlays_t instance via vwm_t. Instead of supplying the
vwm_t to vwm_overlays_create() the bare vwm_xserver_t will be supplied, as
this is the future shared component across vmon and vwm (in addition to
overlays).
|
|
|
|
In preparation for separating out the monitoring overlay code
from being vwm-coupled, moving these into an independent header
since they'll be used throughout.
|
|
This moves the console teardown back to vwm.c, trivial cleanup.
|
|
This was a known bug, there's a TODO sitting right there noting it.
The items array was sized very large so it never triggered and was
forgotten about.
Running `make tags` in the linux kernel source steps on it though,
because it constructs a massive argv.
This just adds a bounds check so no crash occurs in argv2xtext().
I don't see the point of allocating memory for this as the TODO's
suggested, since any such argv is unlikely to fit in the overlay
anyways.
Also shrunk the max from 1024 to 512, which is still quite large.
|
|
Long overdue house cleaning.
The addition of compositing/monitoring overlays in vwm3 pushed vwm well past
what is a reasonable size for a simple thousand line file. This is a first
step towards restoring sanity in the code, but no behavioral differences are
intended, this is mostly just shuffling around and organizing code.
I expect some performance regressions initially, follow-on commits will make
more improvements to that end as the dust settles.
|
